Hi,I own my residence outright and am interested in buying a second home. Would it be better to refinance my primary residence and use the money to purchase the second home. ( is this easier to obtain?) Are there any downsides to this approach? I am self employed, own two homes presently ( one is a rental in Palo Alto with a long term tenant) no debt other than a small amount remaining on the rental mortgage, and haven't ventured into the waters for about 8 years. It looks like loan qualification has changed considerably in that time period.Thanks for any suggestions. by edmarty34 from , . Jun 16th 2011
Sounds like the approach you have in mind will be your best route to take and most definitley the cheapest. The guidelines have changed dramatically since 8 years ago. The only thing that you may run into challenges with is income being that you are self employed. There are no more stated income loans, or bank statement loans. You will have to show full business and personal tax returns in order to qualify for a loan. it will all come down to home much income you claim. Good luck!
You would probably benefit the most by putting 20-30% down on the investment property and not touching the equity in your home. Rates are really low, and the process is not much different. You now need to show tax returns for income, so if you write off all your income, you may have a problem. Also to use rental income for any property you already own, you need 30% or more in equity to use the rental payments as income. I am a direct lender in California, if you are interested to learn more about the programs available to you and the process, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
Ask our community a question.