risk vs reward... because of all the money lost from the defaults, lenders are gun shy... so they are padding their coffers now to offset their past losses.. as the economy recovers, I would expect some of the guidelines will ease up... I'm a Broker here in Scottsdale AZ and I only lend in Arizona. If you or someone you know is looking for financing options, feel free to contact me or pass along my information. 480-287-5714 WilliamAcres.com
I personally don't think mortgage credit is too tight today. The industry pretty much simply went back to old fashioned underwriting guidelines. Guidelines that I may remind everyone never resulted in any nationwide disaster. It is pretty simple, if you have a little bit of down payment, you have managed your financial affairs correctly, you have stable income, and you are looking to buy a house you can safely afford - you WILL get a mortgage loan today. If you can't properly document your income, you have poor credit, have unstable income, and don't have two pennies to rub together - you will NOT get a loan. Finally, if you have had a bankruptcy or foreclosure, you CAN get a loan again after a few years of credit rebuilding and successfully proving you are worthy again... In MN or WI, visit www.JoeMetzler.com
The industry is still suffering from all the foreclosures and loans in default 90+ days behind. Simple answer is underwriting standards / credit standards will only improve once values increase and defaults are lower. There are many other factors but this is your basic answer.
These are set by the goverment agencies at FHFA for Fannie and Freddie. Write your congressment and women PLEASE!! FHFA announced last week that the average denial with with them has come DOWN from a 764 to a 743 with a DTI ratio of 35.7%!! Unbelievable but reality. FHA sets their own but they have the MI "Tax" on everyloan. Mortgages are all directed by these Governing bodies so PLEASE write your congress people.
Maybe. But at this time they are looking for people who have the ability to pay for the debt they borrow. They are not interested in high risk loans
High-risk loans were a major reason for the mortgage meltdown of 2007-2010. Lenders are slow to get in the same position again.
The rates being high or low really have nothing to do with the tight credit. It's more about the losses that the mortgage industry has sustained over the past few years. A few years ago Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac went to what is called risk based pricing. That mean your credit score among other criteria will determine the rate you will get. The lower the credit scores the higher the rate. There is a little more to it than that but you get the idea. I think when the economy gets better you may see credit loosen up some. However, risk based pricing, unfortunately, is here to stay.
Because the mortgage industry has been blamed for the national crisis. They said it happened because mortgages were too easy to get - you could get one if you could fog a mirror. Not anymore.
New rules have been imposed that now require the lender to measure the borrowers ability to repay. This "responsiblity" and the consequences of not following the new rules have caused lenders to tighten their creodt requirements. That said, this is about where the standards should have been in 2004-2007. If they had been, the financial crisis of 2008 would have much less painful for EVERYONE.
The number of high risk loans that were given out prior to 2007 were essentially what caused the housing market to collapse. There was a large number of borrowers who were given loans that had poor credit scores, not enough income, a high debt-to-income ratio, etc. Many of these borrowers ended up defaulting on their home loans and could not pay them. As the economy continues to improve, lending standards might loosen up a little, but lenders have these strict requirements to protect themselves from borrowers.
Joe has good answer -- and with the advent of "Qualified Mortgages" - as set forth by Congress, and interpreted by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau the lenders will be finding themselves on the line for any loans that don't meet the strict criteria being promoted. Look at it this way -- you, as a lender, loan someone $400,000 for a home, and you sell the note to someone else, so you have that money to loan to the next person who needs a loan. Under the new criteria, if that loan doesn't meet the rules set down, and the borrower doesn't makethe payments, you get to "buy back" the mortgage from whomever owns it when it goes bad. With that kind of "sword of Damacles" hanging around, the lenders are going to be very careful how they lend.
They're strict because the mortgage industry has been abused in the past, and is in the process of recovering.
Ask our community a question.